Tag Archives: leaders


New York Jets Team Up With Academics To Boost Team’s Prospects

The New York Jets have been one of the most inconsistent teams in the NFL over the last decade, but help is on the way from the college ranks. No, not a stud quarterback or defensive lineman, but a crop of undergraduate and graduate students who have been studying the Jets and training to help the team solve some of its most pressing business and marketing problems.

This is thanks to a brand-new partnership between the Jets and the NYU School of Professional Studies (NYUSPS) through which a hand-selected group of the university’s students will take a Jets-themed course every semester taught by NYU faculty working alongside team executives. Students will also have access to a Jets-oriented innovation lab geared toward generating new sports, media, or entertainment ideas through an accelerator, hackathons, and/or demo days, that could be implemented by the NFL team.

[Photo: courtesy of the New York Jets]

“For us, it’s always about trying to be innovative,” Jets president Neil Glat told Fast Company. “Having access and [building] relationship with students doing innovative things, whether in the sports space or media [is] helpful in staying current.”

While it would tempting to think of the partnership as a purely academic exercise–albeit one that could help NYU students land internships or even staff jobs with the Jets–Glat is quick to reject that notion. “We’re interested in real-life applications, business executions, new fan engagement opportunities, and new offerings for our fans,” he said. “This is not meant to be theoretical. This is meant to be something that is actualized.”

That’s why, Glat continued, the first course will task NYUSPS students with optimizing the Jets’ mobile app, coming up with potential improvements to the fan-facing tool within a year. “It’s not just something that’s talked about,” he said. “It’s going to be done.”

Teaming with the Jets is the latest in a string of NYUSPS’s partnerships with industry. Previously, it has offered courses that give students direct access to execs from Fox Sports, ROC Nation, the New York Mets, and espnW.

[Photo: courtesy of the New York Jets]

But NYUSPS dean Dennis DiLorenzo says the Jets partnership is on a different level–the first time students have had the opportunity to take a course, as well as participate in efforts to directly impact and innovate the partner’s business, while also helping to boost its sense of social responsibility. “All of those things are tenets of this relationship,” DiLorenzo said. “We’re hoping to take it to the next level.”

The dean said NYUSPS wanted to work with the Jets because the partnership blends well with the school’s mission of offering students an “experiential learning model.” And that mission, in fact, helped the team and the school design the partnership’s elements.

Part of that was helping the Jets develop better business practices, DiLorenzo said, that are meant to open doors to more diverse perspectives–something that is a key part of the school’s brand of education. “The Jets have always been about grit and welcoming fans from all walks of life,” he said, a similar element of the NYUSPS mission. “So the partnership was born.”

[Photo: courtesy of the New York Jets]

More specifically, he said, the Jets have a very blue-collar fanbase, while NYUSPS strives to attract people beyond those who might normally attend a professional school. That similar focus helped both sides see that they were on the same page. “We’re in the business of making leaders, and building leaders from all walks of life,” DiLorenzo argued, “not just supporting people who’ve already achieved leadership status.”

That philosophy no doubt appealed to the Jets, a team that while having been in the NFL for decades, has struggled to keep up with more star-studded and successful teams like the New York Giants, New England Patriots, Dallas Cowboys, and others.

And are students interested in taking part? Definitely, said DiLorenzo.

“We sent this out to our student population with very specific criteria of experience and academic success,” he said, “and we had students compete to see who could get into that class based on their portfolios and interviews.”

The school put out the call for applicants in July, and got more than 100 students vying for just 18 seats in the class that began last week.

“We didn’t have a lot of time to promote this,” DiLorenzo said, “but they came forward the minute that they saw this.

design employment • Re: Beginner in MEDICAL device design_Advise/Books/website/.

Samuel_Desprez wrote:
The company specializes in drug delivery injection product.
For what I know, I need to worry about mostly everything (haha..). We do product strategy, on field observation, front end conceptualization, prototyping (in-house and external manufacturer), quality test, documentations (FDA approval).

I think it’s gonna be a very good formation for me.

It is amazing to me a simple piston syringe, with or without a needle requires a 510K. And if you are a unit dose device, an NDA will be required. All pertinent information on submissions will be on fda.gov.

If you are going into the field, you’ll need credentialing through VendorMate, MedReps and a third one that escapes me. You have to update once a year for all three with shots and documentation of shots.

For any 510K or NDA most of the 1-5 years it will take to launch a product will be used on testing and trials. I would highly suggest speaking with your regulatory group on finding a way to say yes (they typically say no) to trying product on people in the field. I can’t tell how many bad ideas come out of the lab, untested on actual users, that get rammed through because of the high cost of investment only to miserably fail in sales. That company will quickly become a follower.

What typically happens in the medical field, you’ll have the leaders, with a good innovation system, and the followers who knock-off the innovators. There are only a few innovators and being in the NPD group of a follower sucks.


general design discussion • The Human Aura

Since ancient times we have seen images and paintings of diverse spiritual leaders crossways various traditions however one thing that is common amongst all of them is the halo that environs their head which is recognized as the Aura- energy arena. It not only surrounds just the head however also extends all round your body. This aura signifies your physical, emotional mental, as well as divine energies.

The aura is frequently seen a mix of fine colored frequencies wherever each color defines its own distinct nature plus characteristics. The shaking of this aura is actually fine and delicate so we need very fine tools to detect it otherwise may be we can use our inborn instinctive mechanism plus our latent psychic perspective to train ourselves not merely to see the aura however also to interpret the diverse colours and forms in the aura which can disclose us a lot of unspoken information

What Is the Human Aura?

The human aura is an area of subtle, glowing radiation adjacent us and spreading outer from our physical form. Auras are connected to the electromagnetic area of the body plus serve as a visual amount of our mental, expressive, physical plus spiritual states.

Everything that we do otherwise think touches the aura so it is typically in a state of flux, always changing, founded on our mental meanderings plus physical health. The aura is moreover affected by the energies of the atmosphere, the force fields of the world and the radio frequencies that interpenetrate all methods of a matter. The aura is an electric signature of who we are.

The Color of the Human Aura

The colors of the aura might glow and discharge with joy and energy as we keep a state of holiness in God. Or the colors might become dull, constructed and stultified once we are gloomy, while we allow ourselves to be unhappy when we criticize or see life as less than lovely.

Appreciation strengthens the aura as the heart originates a pink plus golden sun-like happiness. And at other times while we put ourselves down otherwise enter into the criticism of others, the size and happiness of our auras lessen. Holding imageries and ideas of ourselves as well as others as less than entire also impinges on our aptitude to send out auric areas of light energy that bless plus uplift.

Thoughts, Feelings, Diet as well as the Human Aura

Diet has an influence on the aura. But more prominently, what we take in with our eyes and ears and whatever we think affects the power and pattern of the aura. While we put our courtesy upon God and all that this period represents for us, the rotating of our chakras quickens and a resonance with the potentials of God starts to cleanse the aura plus expand it.

The Human Aura as well as the Chakras

The chakras are similar generating stations inside us. Alike to the mitochondria, those organelle control houses which reside inside each human cell, these places of light can be an excessive self-regenerating emphasis.

We can imagine our chakras every day. And as we emphasis on a precise chakra, we see its petals rotating and then quickening in perfect balance and equilibrium. We see the entire radiance of these seven main generating stations increasing and blessing ourselves as well as all those who drive within our range of influence.

The excellence of our prayers is reliant on the excellence of our heart, our awareness…and, so, our aura. If we wish to be of superior service and efficacy, if we wish to perform alchemical feats for the good of manhood, we must first go inside, self-assess as well as get in balance. We must appear to our chakras and wash them every day in the light of God. In order, their acceleration will make a rise and expansion in an awareness that is transformational.

The entirety of who we are is transmission to the world over the aura that discharges out from us, even though maximum persons do not see this aurora borealis-similar light show around themselves and others. And if we wish to upsurge the beauty, intensity as well as a size of our aura, it will definitely occur as we emphasize more and more on all that is optimistic, kind, considerate, forgiving, and just as well as loving.
spirit Secret

These Expressions Make You Sound Like You Don’t Know What You’re Talking About

A friend of mine was recently telling me about her new job. “I like it, except my boss is hard to read,” she said. “I wish she’d just come out and say what she thinks!” Instead, her boss uses wishy-washy expressions like, “Hopefully you’re okay with this?” and, “I might possibly have a suggestion for you.”

As organizations become flatter, communicating well in every direction is getting more important. But managers and leaders are often worried about sounding too controlling, so they soften what they say. Their team members, taking their cue, bury their own ideas under hedging expressions that muddle their meaning. Before long, everyone just winds up sounding less clear, confident, and authoritative than they actually feel. In order to make sure you sound like you know what you’re talking about, cut these common words and phrases from your vocabulary.

Related: This Three-Word Phrase Is Subtly Undermining Your Authority

1. “I’m Not Sure, But . . . “

For starters, it’s okay not to be sure about something. After all, false confidence is often just as bad as open ignorance. But saying “I’m not sure” when you really do have a decent grasp on the matter only undercuts your cause.

When your employee, for instance, says, “I’m not quite sure, but I should have the report done by Friday,” you’re left to wonder whether that means you’ll actually have to wait until the following week, or that they’re just being modest. There are better ways to communicate tentativeness in cases like this: “I’m waiting on a few more data points from our finance team, so as long as those come through tomorrow, the report will be ready by Friday.” Now your employee sounds like she knows what she’s talking about.

Similar qualifiers to avoid include “only a thought,” “just my opinion,” “hard to say,” and “this might be a silly question.” None of these humble idioms help you make a compelling case about a complicated topic, or let you underscore what you do know in a situation where there are unknowns. The goal isn’t to minimize uncertainty or downplay risks. It’s to be taken seriously as someone who can navigate those gray-area experiences with well-founded confidence.

Related: Six Words And Phrases That Make Everyone Hate Working With You

2. “Sort Of” Or “Kind Of”

When someone says, “I sort of think” or “I kind of suspect,” it’s clear they either don’t want to come out and speak the truth or else don’t really know their own mind.

Maybe a sales manager says something like this: “I kind of think we should approach that client again–it’s been a long time since we’ve heard from them. What do you think?” Is she uncertain about going forward and genuinely wants your opinion, or is she just trying to give direction by softening her statement?

Or perhaps your boss says, “I sort of liked the work you turned in last week.” Perhaps she’s suggesting your work wasn’t up to snuff, or perhaps she’s just giving you a compliment and softening her language. It might seem like an unimportant difference, but in reality it leaves you not knowing how to respond: Do you keep doing what you’ve been doing, or do you ask for feedback on how to do better work next time?

Not only do these phrases create a lack of clarity for team members, they also make team leaders who use them sound less confident and transparent than they should.

3. “Maybe,” “Possibly,” And “Potentially”

“Maybe,” “possibly,” “probably,” “basically,” “largely,” and “hopefully” are all words that smack of indecision. If a manager says to a staff member, “Hopefully you’ll be okay with this change,” his listener might wonder whether she actually has leeway to challenge it.

Many qualifiers like these have a similar effect. An employee tells a supervisor, “The project is largely complete”–instead of actually saying when it will be done or why it’s not quite there yet. An IT manager says to an internal client, “It’s basically a software problem, but possibly we can fix it pretty soon ourselves.” Is this good news or bad news? Who knows! None of these phrases instill much confidence that the speaker has a handle on the situation.

4. Using The Past Tense When You Mean The Present

How many times have you been in a meeting and heard a colleague say, “I thought I should mention that . . . ” or, “I was thinking we should . . . “? It sounds like the person talking no longer quite believes in whatever idea they’re putting forward. Compare those past tense expressions to phrases like “I want to mention . . .” and “I think we should . . .” and the difference is clear.

Similarly, when you say, “I just wanted to point out that our project is well under way,” the first part of the statement hedges the rest of the sentence that comes after it, which is actually positive. It’s as though you really did have something to say, then thought better of it, but finally decided–hesitantly–to put it out there anyway. You’ve just created confusion, rather than announcing clearly and confidently that your project is going just fine.

If you want to sound like a capable speaker who knows what you’re talking about, don’t water down your message. Avoid these four patterns and expressions. They don’t make you sound more approachable–they just make you sound uncertain, even when you aren’t.

These Are Email Templates To Use When You Want To Ask For An Introduction

Throughout the course of your career, there will be times when you need to ask for an introduction–even when you don’t want to. Whether you’re a new entrepreneur looking for an “in” with investors or just seeking a career change, you’ll need to tap your network for referrals, connections, and opportunities to chat.

Needless to say, making these requests can feel awkward–but it doesn’t have to. Here’s a three-step process that can make the whole experience less scary, all starting with the very first email you send, asking to be put in touch.

Step 1: Be Direct, But Leave Them An “Out”

Once you’ve identified the person who knows you and your desired connection, send an email to them that’s casual, but be up front and direct. Include a link to the desired connection’s LinkedIn profile and always give the other person an easy out in case they can’t make the connection for one reason or another. Either share the pertinent details that your acquaintance needs to make the intro right then–or let them know you’ll follow up ASAP with an email they can forward easily.

Here’s a sample email:


Hope all is well.  It was good to see you at the retail leaders’ dinner in Palo Alto in July. How was the trip to Iceland? It’s still on our bucket list.

I’m reaching out to ask for an introduction to John Smith at XYZ Company. We’ve just released a new product that is seeing some surprising traction with restaurant chains. John’s feedback on how he might think about this type of data would be very helpful.

Would you mind making an introduction?  If so, I’ll send you an email that will make it easy to forward to John.



If the person declines to make the introduction, don’t take it personally. Be gracious, say thank you, move on. He or she might not know the person that well, or have some history that you’re simply not privy to.

Step Two: Follow Up Immediately

That day, be sure to send an email that’s easily forwarded to your target. Remember that you’re really speaking to two audiences here–your mutual connection and your desired connection.

Related: The Best Way To Introduce Yourself In Five Potentially Awkward Situations 

In your note, you should provide some basic details about yourself–yes, your mutual connection knows who you are, but your new connection probably doesn’t. In addition, you should be specific about your request and who you’re trying to get to. It’s not enough to ask for a generic intro. After all, your mutual connection is putting their social capital and network on the line. Make sure you take that seriously and do your homework before you make the request.

Here’s a sample email:


Good to catch up this week–enjoyed hearing about the trip to Iceland.  As I mentioned, I’m looking for an introduction to John Smith at XYZ Company.

As you know, in my role as the CEO of Euclid, I spend a lot of time with various retail and restaurant leaders understanding how we can provide the most impact in solving some of their most pressing customer acquisition and offline attribution problems. We’ve just released a new product that is seeing some surprising traction with restaurant chains and John’s feedback on how he might think about this type of data would be very helpful.

Would you mind making an introduction?  Let me know if you need anything else that might be helpful.



Step Three: Make Your Mutual Connection Look Good, And Then Add Your Own Value

Once your mutual connection does make their intro, don’t forget that they’re doing you a favor and putting their relationship and credibility on the line. Make them look good. Respond immediately on the same day.

Make it super easy for your target to connect with you and find a good time to talk. Remember, this person doesn’t know you so your behavior is a reflection on the mutual introduction who connected you. Don’t embarrass them.

Related: How The Most Successful People Ask Questions 

Find a way to be helpful after the introduction is made. Comb your network for people who might be helpful to your new connection. Pass along a useful article. Send along a small gift after a good conversation, such as a book that has relevance to something you discussed, with a warm note of thanks. And while you’re at it, follow up with your mutual connection to say thanks and report back on how your conversation went. It’s always great to hear that things went positively.

Brent Franson is the CEO of Euclid, a data platform that provides offline identity and behavior for brick-and-mortar brands.

Which one defines you more: Your race or your politics?

A new study suggests Americans tend to view their political party as a more accurate picture of who they are—even more than their race, gender, ethnicity, or religion.

But why does political “partyism” trump other social identifiers?

One reason is that you choose who you’ll support politically—but race and ethnicity are assigned at birth.

“Because partisan affiliation is voluntary, it is a much more informative measure of attitudes and belief structures than, for example, knowing what skin color someone has,” according to the study in the European Journal of Political Research.

Further, unlike race, religion, and gender, where social norms dictate behavior—there are few, if any, constraints on the expression of hostility toward people who adhere to opposing political ideologies.

For example, certain words are out-of-bounds when directed toward people of specific races or genders. But these boundaries don’t really apply in a partisan environment and boorish behavior may actually be encouraged by party leaders.

“There are no corresponding pressures to moderate disapproval of political opponents. In fact, the rhetoric and behavior of party leaders suggests to voters that it is perfectly acceptable to treat opponents with disdain. In this sense, individuals have greater freedom to discriminate against out-party supporters.”

Americans aren’t the only ones

To measure levels of partisanship, researchers used a behavioral game involving donating money to individuals based on profiles that included, among other information, their political affiliation. The study involved more than 4,000 participants from Belgium, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Party, not gender, shapes politicians’ tweets

The game’s results reveal that players from all four countries exhibited strong bonds with politically like-minded players while expressing “significant dislike for members of the political opposition,” the paper states.

The researchers also found this partisan behavior appeared both in divided societies, like Belgium and Spain, where rifts along social lines run deep, and in integrated societies, like the UK and the US, where those social divides are less prevalent.

“…partisans are motivated more by out-group animosity than in-group favoritism.”

Americans’ animosity toward players from opposing political viewpoints was stronger than favoritism shown toward politically like-minded players. In other words, they disliked their enemies even more than they liked their friends.

American players provided an 8 percent bonus to players with the same partisan affiliation. However, Republican participants were penalized 10 percent by Democrats and Democratic participants were penalized 16 percent by Republicans.

“This finding suggests that partisans are motivated more by out-group animosity than in-group favoritism,” says Shanto Iyengar, a professor of communication and political science at Stanford University.

The widespread behavior suggests that Americans are not alone in having their partisan beliefs occupy a major identity role.

Working class voters ditched party loyalty in 2016

Despite the similarities with other countries, Americans were distinct in their outward display of partisan identities. Americans affix bumper stickers to their cars and place yard signs outside their homes advertising their political preferences, a behavior uncommon in other societies where citizens tend to keep those views to themselves.

“American campaigns feature greater involvement on the part of ordinary citizens,” Iyengar says. “Campaigns also last much longer than in Europe, giving people more opportunities to send signals concerning their political affiliation.”

Other coauthors are from Dartmouth College, the University of Antwerp, the University of the Basque Country, the University of Deusto, and Berlin Social Science Center.

Source: Stanford University

The post Which one defines you more: Your race or your politics? appeared first on Futurity.

This Startup CEO’s Email To His Team Is A Masterclass In Vulnerability

As an editor here at Fast Company’s Leadership section, I witness all kinds of entrepreneurial posturing every single day. Most founders–at least when they interact with the press–make a point of sounding enthused and confident, or humble and self-deprecating, or dead serious and mission-driven. Pick your PR persona and run with it.

But it’s far more interesting to glimpse how leaders actually communicate with their teams behind the scenes. Christian Bonilla, the CEO of a software market-research startup called UserMuse, has been a Fast Company contributor for just under a year. As we were trading notes this week on new story ideas, Christian forwarded me an email he recently sent to his four-person team that he said earned a surprisingly positive response, and asked if I thought it might be a good springboard for a story.

I thought it was great as-is, and instead of spinning it into an article himself, Christian agreed to let me reproduce his email in full. Here it is, very lightly edited and with his young son’s name redacted for privacy:


Yesterday around 7PM, my evening took a weird turn. We all have kids, so I can share this. XXXX, evidently in an odd mood, decided to relieve himself in the tub the way no one wants to see their kid do.

So five minutes later, Lauren’s bleaching the tub and I’m carrying a garbage bag of unmentionable filth down the stairs when I missed a step and twisted my ankle as badly as I can remember doing. I mean blinding pain, guys – I screamed, which made XXXX run down to where I was and then start crying. So there I was, crumpled in a heap at the foot of the stairs, clutching my devastated ankle and consoling a toddler as I sat next to a bag of smelly trash. I did not feel like a CEO in that moment.

Now, I told you that so I can tell you this: It doesn’t always feel like we’re starting something big. You guys are sweating it out in every spare moment you have. I’m working more than I ever have in my life and haven’t had a paycheck since May. But we ARE starting something big, and we’re getting there one small milestone at a time.

This week we had our first gross profit.

It doesn’t mean we’re a profitable business – this is a volatile a stage and things are going to be up and down for a while. But if we can net $300 in a week, we can net $400. And if we can net $400…


Trust me, there’s no shortage of CEOs and entrepreneurs out there with thoughts to share about the value of vulnerability, emotional intelligence, empathy, and those other “soft skills” you keep hearing about. And many of them have great things to say on those subjects. But seeing those traits put into practice proves just how powerful it can be–and how simple it is to do.

Christian might’ve been surprised that his 264-word email made for such an effective pep talk, but I’m not. In that short space, he tells a memorable story, shares candidly how hard things feel, and points out that it’s the small wins that matter most (because–look! they’re already paying off). That’s the kind of honesty people need from all their leaders, not just startup CEOs. In the long run, it beats out affectation and bluster every single time.

Some of the ridiculously long and weird company names just banned by China

After banning “bizarre” buildings last year, China’s State Administration for Industry and Commerce launched a campaign this week against a not-uncommon phenomenon in the country: weird and long company names. Monikers that are paragraphs, long sentences, or entire literary narratives, or that include sensitive language or political terms, are now considered “inappropriate.” According to the Legal Daily and some sleuthing netizens, some (translated) candidates for prohibition include:

  • Shenyang Prehistoric Powers Hotel Management Limited Company: named for swimmer Fu Yuanhui, who, after winning a bronze medal at the Rio Olympics, declared: “I have used all my prehistoric powers to swim!”
  • There Is a Group of Young People With Dreams, Who Believe They Can Make the Wonders of Life Under the Leadership of Uncle Niu Internet Technology Co Ltd., or Uncle Niu, a condom maker.
  • What Are You Looking At Shenzhen Technology Co. Ltd., a virtual reality company.
  • “Skinny Blue Mushroom”: Some restaurants and cafés have included in their names a phrase made popular by a meme from last year that mocked a man from Guangxi province. “Unbearable, I want to cry,” he moaned, but his accent made it sound more like “skinny blue mushroom.”
  • King of Nanning, Guangxi and His Friends Trading Company Ltd., which runs two Vietnamese restaurants.
  • Beijing Under My Wife’s Thumb Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Beijing Scared of Wife Technology Company
  • Anping County Scared of Wife Netting Products Factory
  • Hangzhou No Trouble Looking for Trouble Internet Technology

Also a no-go: Names that discriminate according to gender, race or ethnicity, or that reference terrorism, separatism, extremism, religion, the names of national leaders, or illegal organizations. Companies are also forbidden from using their names to imply they are nonprofit organizations.

Despite the new rules, Uncle Niu and some other owners of weirdly named companies the New York Times spoke to have said they plan to keep their monikers for now, or at least until they’re explicitly told to change them.

Is Silicon Valley In Denial Over The Threat Of An “Unthinkable” War With North Korea?

The situation with North Korea has been brewing for years, across several presidencies, going clear back to Bill Clinton. Kicking the can down the road has long been more politically expedient than confronting the belligerent communist nation.

Over the past year, North Korea began to seem more dangerous, with the combination of missile tests and threatening language toward South Korea and the U.S. And this week, when Trump threatened North Korean leader Kim Jong Un with “fire and fury like the world has never seen before,” the situation seemed headed for a moment of truth.

Regrettably, it’s a situation that involves weapons that can kill many millions of people at the push of a button, and a couple of decidedly volatile and unpredictable world leaders. A war—or even an accelerating movement toward war—could, needless to say, have a range of effects on tech companies, all of them serious.

Companies like Apple, Microsoft, and other hardware makers have most of their products manufactured in Asia. Thousands of components suppliers are located in Asia, many on the Korean peninsula. Apple lists 16 South Korean companies in its 2017 supplier list. One of the biggest, Samsung, is the largest supplier in the world of semiconductors, displays, and memory for consumer tech devices. (It’s also, of course, the biggest phone maker in the world.) LG produces display components and phones, among many other things.

All told, South Korea has more than 100 major companies providing products and services all over the world. War in East Asia would be a many-dimensioned tragedy, and one of those dimensions is that the global smartphone industry would pretty much grind to a halt.

In the Valley, few people are seriously worried about war, nuclear or not. Yale professor of management and political science Paul Bracken told me that for most tech leaders, the idea of war against North Korea is still nothing to immediately act upon.

“It seems to me that in the American consciousness, it’s still unthinkable that there could be a war that could destroy significant parts of the Korean industrial base,” Bracken said. “I don’t think it’s been absorbed yet that that could happen.”

Bracken is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and advises private equity funds, accounting, and insurance companies, as well as several arms of the U.S. government. The “unthinkable” mind-set might explain why the U.S. stock market barely reacted to Trump’s provocative “fire and fury” threat (although the CBOE Volatility Index jumped 11% and markets in South Korea and Japan fell.)

The procurement people at large tech companies who manage supplier relationships are very likely now beginning to think about alternative sources for the components they buy from East Asian companies, Bracken told me. But, he said, it’s unlikely this thinking has reached the point where an officer is compelled to go before the board of directors and request funds for an official study into the situation.

Related: Using Cyberattacks To Stop North Korean Nukes Not Easy, Experts Warn

But events over the next several months could make the unthinkable seem thinkable. The U.S. and North Korea have taken a few steps on an escalation path that could lead to war. (This article in the Economist describes just how easily this process could progress.) Until earlier this week, the situation looked like a small, noisy, belligerent country challenging a superpower, while the superpower relied mainly on behind-the-scenes diplomacy and sanctions to control the situation. Trump’s “fire and fury” comment, arguably, transformed the relationship into one based on threatening each other with the most powerful weapons in the world.

A Years-Long Recovery

If this tit-for-tat dynamic was to continue and advance beyond words to aggressive actions, symbolic or otherwise, the situation could take on the appearance at least of an escalation toward war. Such situations are subject to all manner of miscommunications and misjudgments on both sides that can push the situation to the brink in unimaginable ways.

If war in East Asia began to seem inevitable, technology businesses in that part of the world would be disrupted. Workers at manufacturing facilities and suppliers would stay home from work. Orders might run way behind or go unfilled.

The crisis could also generate a humanitarian crisis that could put severe stress on South Korea and China in social, political, and economic ways. If a military attack by the U.S. and South Korea on North Korea seemed imminent, millions of North Koreans would likely rush over the border to South Korea and China.

Creative Strategies analyst Tim Bajarin recently spoke with a South Korean tech leader who said that eventuality is his worst fear. The executive added that it could take years for South Korean officials to restabilize the region. And it could take years longer for tech companies to get back to producing and delivering their products on time.

Related: The Dangerous Mission To Undermine North Korea With Flash Drives

U.S. tech companies are increasingly dependent on China, both for component parts and manufacturing, and for the masses of consumers it hopes to win there. A military conflict on the Korean peninsula could also put China, a sometimes hesitant ally of Pyongyang, into a defensive position against the U.S., and would strain those business relationships. “China is getting to be a much tougher environment for U.S. technology companies on a number of fronts, from intellectual property to rules and regulations,” Bracken said.

With so much of the world’s manufacturing and components supply in the region, the global tech economy would suffer, which would pull down the rest of the U.S. economy.

The long-term effects could break in many different ways. One Valley executive told me the U.S. economy could actually benefit, because some suppliers and manufacturers might see East Asia and especially South Korea as too risky a place to do business and decide to move operations to the U.S. If that were to happen, the cost of tech products might increase (due to the cost of new infrastructure builds and more expensive labor), but so might job growth here at home.

Of course, war in the nuclear age is too high a price to pay for any positive economic outcomes. Bracken says the world needs to get used to a nuclear North Korea. Any realistic opportunity to neuter the nation using military force passed long ago, he believes. The risks are just too great. While it’s doubtful North Korea could actually deliver a nuclear payload to the continental U.S., it’s quite possible it could deliver one to Seoul or Tokyo.

What’s needed now is a calm, long-term, bilateral containment plan that at no time pushes Kim Jong Un into a corner where pushing the red button seems like the only option.


Young Chicagoans Are Camping On The City’s Most Dangerous Blocks To Protest Violence

A little after 7 p.m on Friday, July 7, a 20-year-old man was shot in Chicago’s Washington Park neighborhood–the first of 41 people shot in the city over the weekend. At 8 p.m., an 18-year-old was shot in Brighton Park, also on city’s South Side. Meanwhile, in the Back of the Yards neighborhood roughly halfway between both shootings, a group of 250 young people were gathering on the street. Their purpose: to spend the night protesting the city’s violence, at a location and time when violence was likely to occur.

The campout, organized by young leaders from the local community development organization The Resurrection Project, was the first of a series of actions planned for Friday nights on some of Chicago’s roughest blocks. The evening started with a peace march through the neighborhood, followed by speakers. As people lined up for food on a grill, they stopped by tables connecting them to community services like affordable housing. As it got dark, people started to play basketball, dance, and gather around a fire pit to talk.

“At around 12:30, we had about 50 people on a street corner in the South Side of Chicago to learn about Dr. Martin Luther King’s philosophy of nonviolence,” says Berto Aguayo, a 22-year-old community organizer for The Resurrection Project. “You have that going on around the fire pit, which is kind of an unusual sight, that late at night.”

“I think a lot of residents–and young people, especially–were fed up with all the violence happening in the community.” [Photo: The Resurrection Project]

The organization isn’t primarily focused on reducing violence; it aims to foster community “ownership” or involvement, develops affordable housing and community centers such as schools and senior centers, and helps low-income residents learn how to build wealth. It first started organizing the events, which it calls #IncreaseThePeace, in October 2016, after a 16-year-old girl was killed in front of one of the organization’s offices.

“I think a lot of residents–and young people, especially–were fed up with all the violence happening in the community,” Aguayo says. “So when this shooting happened that took away a 16-year-old girl, I think all of us collectively said ‘Enough.’ One of the things we said was, ‘Why don’t we camp out on the corner where the shooting took place?’ It was one of those things where we convinced ourselves that it wasn’t that crazy of an idea to camp out on one of the hottest blocks in the city.”

“Hot blocks” or “hot corners”–places where gang violence is likely to occur both because of the overall presence of gangs and because violence has happened at those locations in the past–are common in Chicago’s South Side, and some neighborhoods, such as Back of the Yards, have seen a recent increase in violence with automatic weapons. The blame is often laid on young people, and the group wanted both to change the narrative and to empower youth.

“It’s young people beginning to feel that they can be part of something, something productive,” says Raul Raymundo, cofounder and CEO of The Resurrection Project. “Because the image of these inner city tough areas is despair and powerlessness.”

“At around 12:30, we had about 50 people on a street corner in the South Side of Chicago to learn about Dr. Martin Luther King’s philosophy of nonviolence.” [Photo: The Resurrection Project]

“I think this gained a lot of traction because it was youth-led,” says Aguayo. “That was one of the biggest things that was different. Too often we talked about community violence, and youth violence, especially, without young people at the table.”

The campouts, which usually last from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m., are not isolated events; for a week leading up to each event, volunteers clean up the neighborhood and spend time on the street reporting problems like broken streetlights to the city, and knocking on doors registering voters and inviting neighbors to the peace march and campout. During the event, as people see the action and join in, the group uses it as a way to recruit new leaders for future events. Since the group first began organizing the events in October 2016, there have been seven campouts. Four additional campouts will happen this summer.

One young leader, a 16-year-old with a criminal record, is now volunteering to help the community and “advocating peace,” Aguayo says, after coming to work with the organization three months ago. Fifty young leaders are now involved with the campaign (the organization as a whole has 125 employees).

By playing soccer or breakdancing in the middle of the night, the group is reclaiming the street “when things are most likely to go down, and people are most vulnerable and scared,” he says.

The goal is to continue to grow. “With these campouts happening every week, we really hope to recruit more leaders, so they can help us with our peace efforts in the long term,” he says. “That’s what we hope to do: to make sure that we’re creating young leaders that will be helping us create a culture of nonviolence in our communities.”